It still makes me cringe like fingernails on a chalkboard when I hear anyone refer to the U.S. as a democracy, but this latest post by a contributor to The Anti-Idiotarian Rottweiler reminded me of a couple of things about our republic, and I thought of something he didn't even mention which I think is more important than all of his points put together.
What if every bill proposed in the House or the Senate had to pass a test to see whether or not the Constitution authorized it?
The 112th Congress is about to convene and the collective mouthpiece for the socialist administration and supporters is just going nuts over the fact that they plan on reading the Constitution. I tend to think it it is only going to be something to laugh at in sad derision since the GOP leadership makes me think it is nothing more than window dressing.
I could be wasting my time writing about this because I don't know how many people come here and read this stuff, but venting about it makes me feel better. I wonder how much Eric Hoffer thought about the impact his writing might have. Since the inevitable crash is upon us, why not try to educate as many people as possible in case we can try to rebuild something out of the ashes and rubble while we are waiting for Messiah to return? Some of my fellow believer's may think I should focus only on winning souls for God, but I think all of this stuff, every aspect of life and living, are interwoven. How you think about certain political issues will quickly tell me whether you are a believer or not. That's just the fact.
I remember when the democrats howled (Hillary Clinton) over the false accusations that Republicans were questioning the patriotism of the left, or according to her own labeling, progressives, even when it wasn't happening. Much to my chagrin. I certainly wish that the GOP leadership did have the gonads to publicly question the left's patriotism. For decades those on the left with the "D" behind their name have been relentlessly and systematically working to destroy the Constitution, and since the Clinton's occupied the White House, we have enough quotes from their own mouths to prove it. I don't have to try to convince you based on a nuanced action here, or some vague reference over there. The cat's been out of the bag in plain view for quite a while.
The reason I think that the reading of the Constitution on the House floor is mostly window dressing is because the only bills that should be coming to the floor for a vote are bills that defund and abolish every federal agency that cannot be justified by a plain reading of the Constitution. In other words, there would be no time on the agenda to take up any new bills regarding non-existing laws for the next five years or more.
Even before a bill is passed that simply states that the previous "Health Care Reform" act is immediately rendered null and void, The House should pass a resolution that freezes all funding to the following agencies, pending further legislation that abolishes the agencies themselves and directs what is to be done with the property and assets of those agencies. I'll spell them out for a reason. This is just the short list.
Environmental Protection Agency. (EPA) They don't exist to protect any environment. They exist to make it prohibitively expensive to manufacture or process any goods, because the main enemy of "progress" for the left is free-market capitalism.
Food & Drug Administration. (FDA) Exists to siphon off billions of dollars from the drug companies in the form of campaign contributions, and at the same time guarantee that drug companies have a virtual monopoly on medicine that can be patented, while at the same time scaring the public into thinking that natural herbs and foods are dangerous. Nanny government must protect you.
National Endowment for the Arts (NEA) When's the last time you dressed up and went to a symphony? When's the last time you went to an art museum or gallery? I'm sure you have been throwing lots of disposable income around on various art projects. That's why the federal government sees no problem in taking away your money to fund buying millions of dollars worth of incomprehensible statuary to stand outside of government buildings, to fund performance artists who do things that you not only wouldn't watch, but if your child did them you would beat or disown them.
Department of Education. Created by Jimmy Carter in 1979. Prior to that, there was very little education going on in the United States. Engineering, math and science were struggling along without direction or purpose because there was no centralized government agency to look to. There are rumors that we landed men on the moon using slide rules, because the digital calculator hadn't been invented yet. Can you see how much this country failed to accomplish because we had to wait for a visionary like Jimmy Carter to show up?
Now you can go into many fast food restaurants witness the mathematical prowess of high school graduates making change. You can go on Facebook and read the most stunning literary prose of the average American teenager and marvel.
Department of Energy. While France, a country which has led the way in showing Muslims that their country need not be conquered using conventional arms and warfare, has built enough high technology nuclear reactors that their country safely gets 90% of it's energy that way, our DOE has been regulating what little nuclear capability we have nearly out of existence. At the same time, the DOE has been making any building or modernization of Petroleum processing prohibitively expensive or impossible due to unnecessary regulation. How much energy does the DOE produce? None.
This is how modern government works. It would almost be funny if I could say that you can take the name of a government agency, and whatever that name is, that's what they don't do, or don't produce. But, alas, it is worse than that. Whatever the name of the agency is, that's what they are out to destroy.
Don't believe me? Just look at the list.
Internal Revenue Service. Granted they don't actually write the tax law that taxes income, but they administer the Income Tax. Does the IRS promote income? No. They destroy it.
Department of Agriculture (USDA) How many times have you heard of family farms going under; if not for the cost of regulation of farming, then because of the death tax. How many of you know that Corporations like Monsanto and other huge agribusinesses use their lobbying power to put small competitors out of business? The USDA is all about making life hard for small farms and the people who want their products.
Department of Transportation. Just go talk to any truck driver, especially if he's an owner. The next time you are stuck on a very large expanse of concrete and/or asphalt, knowing that you will never get that time back, or contemplating how much it will cost you to repair the damage that was caused by road conditions that should have been repaired months ago, remember that it's called an expressway because it gives you lots of time and reasons to express yourself.
I could go on, but you get the point. The fact of the matter is that since about 1913, about 90% of all the legislation passed and signed into law has been unconstitutional. Let me restate that. Most of that law has been downright illegal. Congresses have just taken the attitude: "We don't care if the Constitution doesn't give us the authority to do this, we want it, and some of our constituents want it, so, there!"
When the people who themselves are supposed to be the guardians of the law become completely lawless themselves, thinking themselves above and outside the law, why should they expect any respect, let alone obedience to their own dictates?
Is there a single person reading this who voted for somebody with the idea in mind that you know that you are just too stupid to decide how best to live your own life; that the supreme law of the land is just too archaic today? Are you the voter who was thinking: "Please, Congressperson, pass whatever law you think best as long as it makes me believe that you will provide housing and jobs and medical care and won't let anybody besides athletes and movie stars make too much money."
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please don't make me disable comments because you couldn't maintain decorum and civil discourse. You can disagree all you want to, just don't get nasty.